Anesthetic monitoring of the thiopental-propofol mixture in canine females during ovariohysterectomy

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22579/20112629.541

Keywords:

Parenteral anesthetics, canine, anesthetic monitoring

Abstract

Objective: to monitor the final expiratory fraction of CO2 (capnometry), oxygen saturation in hemoglobin (pulse oximetry) and non-invasive mean arterial pressure (MAP) in healthy dogs during ovariohysterectomy (OVH), in which anesthesia was induced and maintained with the Propofol-Thiopental (PT) mixture. Materials and methods: Pre-surgical analysis was performed. The premedication included acepromazine, ketoprofen and tramadol, the anesthetic induction was performed with a mixture in equal parts of propofol 10% and thiopental 2.5%. The induction dose was calculated based on the thiopental present in each cm3 of the mixture, and was 3 mg / kg of thiopental / IV. Bowls were given for the effect of 1 mg / kg of thiopental present in the mixture for maintenance. Capnometry, pulse oximetry and MAP were measured every five minutes using a multiparametric monitor. The data were analyzed with an inferential study aimed at finding a confidence interval for the mean oxygen saturation in hemoglobin (SO2), final expiratory fraction of CO2 (FEFCO2) and PAM, with a confidence level of 95%. Results: SO2 maintained an average of 97%, MAP was throughout the intervention above 60 mmHg, FEFCO2 was initially high> 45mmHg, but return to normal values after 25 minutes. On average there was no hypoxia or hypotension, but mild hypercapnia at the beginning. Conclusion: For the three variables studied, the P-T mixture was safe. Studies with broader monitoring are suggested to determine hemodynamic and respiratory safety.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Calabor I. Inductores anestésicos en pequeños animales. (2008); [accedido en octubre, 2014]. URL:www.ucm.es.info/sevicema

Fossum T. 2012. Small Animal Surgery. 3 ed. St. Louis. Mosby. p745.

Galindo V. 2009.Guía práctica de anestesia en pequeños animales. Bogotá. LitoChalver S.A. p45.

Helmann E, et al. The association of propofol usage with postoperative wound infection rate in clean wounds: A retrospective study. Vet Surg. 1999; 28(4):256-259.

Muir W, Hubbell J, Skarda R, Bednarski R. 2012. Manual de Anestesia Veterinaria. 5 ed. Amsterdam. Mosby-Year Book. p234.

Muñoz P, Granados M, Navarrete R. 2019. Manuales clínicos de veterinaria. Anestesiología y cuidados intensivos. Barcelona, España: Elsevier. p. 22.

Naguib M, Sari K. Tiopentone-propofol hypnotic synergism in patients. Br J Anaesth. 1991;67(5):234-236.

Niño M, Chaves A, Salazar C. Cambios hemodinámicas durante la inducción anestésica con tiopental versus propofol en pacientes Asa I y II. Rev Colomb Anestesiol. 2007;(35):53-58.

Padilla C, Cardona R. Comparación de los efectos cardiovasculares del propofol, tiopental y de la mezcla propofol-tipental en un grupo de caninos sanos premedicados con hidromorfona. Rev Med Vet. 2013;(26):133-146.

Pandit, J. Intravenous anaesthetic agents. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2007;9(4):54-159.

Pawson P, Forsyth S. 2008. Agentes anestésicos. En: Madison J, Page J, Church, D. (Ed). Farmacología Clínica en Pequeños Animales. Buenos Aires, Argentina, Inter-Medica. p73 – 80.

Teppema J, Baby S. Anesthetics and control of breathing. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2011;(177):80-92.

Sumano H, Ocampo L. 2016. Farmacología Veterinaria; 3.ed. México: McGrawHill., p606.

Downloads

Published

2019-06-16

Issue

Section

Agricultural sciences

How to Cite

Anesthetic monitoring of the thiopental-propofol mixture in canine females during ovariohysterectomy. (2019). Orinoquia, 23(1), 48-53. https://doi.org/10.22579/20112629.541

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.